Jisc
Blog

Graduate visas, employability and evidence: what universities should be doing now

The government's latest graduate visa announcement could place student outcomes under greater scrutiny. Universities should begin thinking now about the evidence they may need.

Author

  • James Hodgkin

    James Hodgkin

    Head of analytics, Jisc

Group of young adult students walking and communicating outside a modern university building

The UK government's latest budget announcement contains a small but potentially significant change for higher education.

Graduates from "high-compliance universities" with "strong labour market outcomes" will continue to be eligible for a two-year graduate visa, despite the planned reduction of the route to 18 months. However, important details remain unclear, including how compliance and labour market outcomes will be assessed.

For universities, this raises an important question: can we evidence the student outcomes that may increasingly influence our attractiveness to international students?

While the sector waits for further detail, institutions have an opportunity to think about the data, processes and evidence that support successful student outcomes.

From compliance to outcomes

For several years, discussions about international student compliance have focused primarily on enrolment, attendance, engagement and continuation. These remain important.

The government's announcement suggests that future policy may increasingly focus not only on whether students complete their studies, but also on what happens after graduation. Strong labour market outcomes now sit alongside compliance as part of the policy conversation.

This reflects a broader shift. Student success is no longer solely about supporting learners through their programmes. It is becoming increasingly connected to wider institutional priorities, including international recruitment, reputation and graduate employability.

Outcomes do not happen by accident

Graduate outcomes are often viewed as an endpoint.

In reality, they are the product of countless interactions throughout the student journey.

Students who complete their studies successfully, remain engaged with learning, access support when they need it and overcome barriers to progression are generally in a stronger position to achieve positive outcomes after graduation.

This creates an important challenge for universities.

By the time graduate outcomes data becomes available, opportunities to influence those outcomes may have passed. Like continuation rates, graduate employment outcomes are lagging indicators. They reflect experiences and behaviours that developed months or years earlier.

The institutions best positioned to respond are likely to be those that can identify emerging risks much earlier.

The importance of engagement data

Most universities already hold significant amounts of information about their students.

Attendance records, virtual learning environment activity, assessment engagement, student support interactions and academic progress data can all provide valuable insight into the student experience.

The challenge is rarely a lack of data.

More often, universities struggle to bring that information together in ways that support timely and consistent action. When engagement information sits across multiple systems, opportunities to identify and support students can be missed.

This is why many institutions are investing in more joined-up approaches to student engagement monitoring.

A broader understanding of engagement can help institutions identify students who may benefit from additional support long before challenges become visible in continuation, attainment or graduate outcomes data.

Evidence will matter

Whatever measures ultimately sit behind the government's new approach, one thing seems clear - universities will need confidence in their ability to demonstrate how they support student success.

That means having answers to questions such as:

  • Can we identify disengaged students quickly?
  • Do we have a complete picture of engagement beyond attendance alone?
  • Are intervention responsibilities clearly defined?
  • Can we demonstrate what support was offered and when?
  • Do we have evidence of institutional oversight and action?

In an environment where compliance and outcomes are receiving increased attention, the ability to evidence action may become just as important as identifying risk in the first place.

Building a stronger evidence base

Learning analytics is increasingly helping universities address these challenges.

By bringing together engagement, attendance and academic activity data into a shared view of the student, institutions can gain earlier visibility of emerging concerns and better coordinate support interventions.

Importantly, learning analytics is not simply about identifying students at risk. It is about creating an evidence base that helps institutions understand engagement patterns, support student success and demonstrate that appropriate action has been taken.

As universities prepare for evolving expectations around international students, employability and compliance, access to timely, actionable insight will become increasingly valuable.

Turning learning analytics into action

We work with universities across the UK to help them better understand and support the student journey through data and analytics.

Our learning analytics service brings together data from multiple systems to provide a more complete picture of student engagement, helping institutions identify potential issues earlier, coordinate support more effectively and evidence the actions taken.

Alongside the technology, we provide implementation expertise, sector benchmarking and access to a community of practice that enables institutions to learn from peers and develop approaches that reflect emerging regulatory and policy priorities.

As expectations around student outcomes, compliance and graduate employability continue to evolve, we help universities build the data foundations, insight and evidence needed to support student success and demonstrate impact with confidence.

Looking ahead

The details behind the government's announcement are still emerging. Universities do not yet know precisely how "strong labour market outcomes" or "high compliance" will be defined.

However, waiting for complete certainty may be the wrong response.

The institutions best placed to adapt will be those that already have strong visibility of student engagement, clear intervention processes and confidence in the evidence they hold about the student journey.

Because whatever measures are ultimately adopted, success is unlikely to be determined by reporting alone.

It will be shaped by an institution's ability to understand students, support them effectively and demonstrate the impact of those interventions over time.

Find out more

For a practical overview of the governance, compliance and operational considerations involved in implementing learning analytics, download our learning analytics compliance guide, which explores how institutions can build robust processes, manage risk and create a stronger evidence base for student success.

To discuss how learning analytics could support your institution, contact your relationship manager.

Continue reading

Sign up to Headlines

Stay at the forefront of technology in education and research with our tailored newsletter.