In any change management process there will be technical, procedural and cultural barriers. Often the technical and procedural barriers can be quantified and overcome through persistence whereas the cultural barriers can be multi-faceted and more problematic.
Identifying barriers
In terms of mobile learning, there can be additional specific barriers to institutional adoption. Whilst using mobile devices may be popular and institutions may, to a great extent, be ‘pushing at an open door’ there are nevertheless barriers to adoption. Interviewees for this infoKit were keen to share their examples:
The biggest barrier at the minute is still the percentage of students with appropriate devices – but we’re getting there.
John Fairhall, University of Bradford
Even though you still think of smart phones as becoming more common, there are still some barriers there for students… [T]hey don’t like having to pay for stuff to be downloaded to their phones, because they’re on tight budgets.
Keith Cole, Jisc
It really seems to be that students don’t consider mobile web apps to be true mobile apps, because you don’t get them from the store. And so unless there’s something actually in the store to download, they don’t really think about it as a mobile app, and you kind of have to introduce them to it, kind of go out of your way to introduce it to them.
Kyle Bowen, Purdue University, USA
The ALPS project at the University of Leeds, referred to in the snapshots section, had barriers to overcome in addition to those provided by institutions.
Gathering feedback from other professions or the service users… was very challenging for some of our professions.
Julie Laxton, University of Leeds
The Wikipedia page for MLearning considers a number of technical and social reasons for barriers to mobile learning, including:
- Multiple standards, multiple screen sizes, multiple operating systems
- Conceptual differences between e- and m-learning
- No demographic boundary
- Potential disruption of students’ personal and academic lives
- Tracking of results and proper use of this information
Barriers to mobile learning, as with any change management initiative are heavily context-dependent and will alter in terms of intensity as hardware and software change.
Finding enablers
As with the barriers to institutional change and mobile learning initiatives in particular, finding the enablers that allow progress to be made differ depending upon context. There are, however, some ways of approaching mobile learning initiatives as well as ideas that can be gleaned from projects that have trod a similar path.
Claudia Igbrude of the Dublin Institute of Technology, for example, reminds us that SMS text messaging “remains to some extent the lowest common denominator, especially as smartphone use… is not yet at 100%.” “Every mobile phone,” she points out, “can send and receive texts” and “can be used in scaffolding learning experiences, providing just-in-time learning using keywords.”
Tony Bartley of Lowestoft College points out that institutions can use cloud services, “linking to services like Flickr, iPadio, Posterous, Google Docs and the like.” Students, he continues, “may already be using [these] anyway, and if not [they] are very easy and free to set up and can provide equally quick wins.” Using free and low-cost cloud-based services can often mean that useful tools can “easily be demonstrated to students as easy gain, low cost options.”
The following comprises some key barriers with associated enablers identified in the literature and by those interviewed in the course of putting together this guide.
Group | Barrier | Enabler |
---|---|---|
Senior management | Cost |
|
Senior management | Privacy |
|
Teaching staff | Distraction |
|
Teaching staff | Workload |
|
IT staff | Compatibility/security |
|
IT staff | Functionality |
|
Learners | Disruption to personal life |
|
Learners | Unfamiliarity |
|