We use cookies to give you the best experience and to help improve our website

Find out more about how we use cookies

Choose whether to use cookies:

No thanks That's fine

Skip to main content

Jisc

You are in:

  • Advice
  • Guides
  • Electronic management of assessment (EMA) in higher education: processes and systems
  • Submission, marking and feedback process

Utilities:

  • Search the Jisc website
    Clear search results

Search the Jisc website
Clear search results

Navigation:

Guide

Submission, marking and feedback process

Part of

Archived
This content was archived in December 2018

About this guide

  • Published: 29 February 2016
  • Updated: 29 February 2016

View full guide as a single page

Contents

Electronic management of assessment (EMA) in higher education: processes and systems
  • Common problems
  • Implementing processes
  • Improving EMA processes
    • Submission, marking and feedback process
    • Submission process - a detailed view
    • Marking and feedback process - a detailed view
  • Selecting EMA systems
  • Further resources

Ten step process

There are ten core tasks in the process of submission and marking and feedback. These correspond to stages four to seven of the assessment and feedback lifecycle and are the most problematic stages according to our research.

We have chosen to show 11 boxes because 'apply penalty or mitigation' is a single task but might occur at different times depending on whether the penalty was for late submission or academic misconduct. 

By making good use of EMA systems you can cut out much of the manual intervention that consumes resource, introduces error and adds little value to the learning experience.

Below is our overview of the submission, marking and feedback process.

Download the process diagram as a PDF

Download the diagram as a Visio file to edit

 

 

 

Creative Commons attribution information
Submission, marking and feedback process
©Jisc and Bonner McHardy
CC BY-NC-ND

This model covers all types of summative assessment where tutors give a mark as well as qualitative feedback. It also covers iterative processes where students might:

  • Undertake formative checking of their own work using text matching tools to review academic integrity
  • Undertake self or peer review
  • Be required to show evidence that they have engaged with their feedback before their mark is released.

This is a high level overview. There is no right or wrong way to draw a process map - you need to choose the level that is right for you. For example you might choose to break down some of the sub processes further. Find out more in our guide to process mapping.

Book Navigation

  • ‹ Improving EMA processes
  • up
  • Submission process - a detailed view ›
Explore more on this topic
Assessment

You are in:

  • Advice
  • Guides
  • Electronic management of assessment (EMA) in higher education: processes and systems
  • Submission, marking and feedback process

Areas

  • Connectivity
  • Cyber security
  • Cloud
  • Data analytics
  • Libraries, learning resources and research
  • Student experience
  • Trust and identity
  • Advice and guidance

Explore

  • Guides
  • Training
  • Consultancy
  • Events
  • R&D

Useful

  • About
  • Membership
  • Get involved
  • News
  • Jobs

Get in touch

  • Contact us
  • Sign up to our newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Modern slavery
  • Carbon reduction plan
  • Accessibility