We use cookies to give you the best experience and to help improve our website.

Find out more about how we use cookies Thanks for letting me know
Skip to main content
Jisc logo 0300 300 2212
  • Digital resources
    • Library support
      • Jisc Collections
      • Archives Hub
      • Copac
      • Journal Usage Statistics Portal
      • The Keepers Registry
      • Knowledge Base+
      • OpenURL Router
      • SUNCAT
      • Zetoc
      • How we support e-resources management
    • Learning and research resources
      • Citizen Maths
      • Digimap Collections
      • Digimap for Colleges
      • e-books for FE
      • Hairdressing Training
      • Health and social care training Beta
      • Historical Texts
      • Journal Archives
      • Learning analytics Beta
      • Learning on Screen
      • MediaPlus
    • Open access
      • CORE
      • IRUS-UK
      • Monitor Local
      • Monitor UK
      • OpenDOAR
      • Publications Router
      • Repository technical support
      • SHERPA services
      • UK ORCID consortium membership

    Jisc Collections

    We negotiate with publishers, on behalf of the UK higher education sector, to procure and license affordable digital content

  • Network & technology
    • Connectivity
      • Janet Network
      • eduroam
      • Domain registry
      • Govroam
      • IP address assignment
      • Janet Network aurora2
      • Netpath
      • Netsight
      • Network time service (NTP)
      • Managed router service
      • Off-site resolver
      • Primary nameserver service
      • Routers and switches framework
      • Secondary nameserver service
      • Telecommunications framework
    • Cloud
      • Board and committee papers framework
      • Co-location service
      • Data archiving framework
      • GÉANT IaaS framework
      • G Suite for Education
      • Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
      • Microsoft Office 365
      • Shared data centre
    • Cyber security
      • DDoS mitigation
      • Email advice and testing
      • Penetration testing
      • Janet Network CSIRT
      • Mailer shield
      • Safe Share
      • Security blacklists and whitelists
      • Simulated phishing and associated training
      • Vulnerability assessment and information service
      • Web filtering and monitoring
    • Trust and identity
      • Assent
      • Certificate service
      • Liberate
      • UK Access Management Federation
    • Videoconferencing and communications
      • JiscMail
      • Janet txt
      • Online surveys
      • Telephony purchasing service
      • Vscene
  • Advice
    • Training
      • Digital leaders programme - higher and further education
      • Making your digital collections easier to discover
      • Workshop to Raise Awareness of Prevent (WRAP)
      • + explore all training
    • Guides
      • Data and analytics guides
      • Digital literacy guides
      • Open access guides
      • Research data guides
      • + explore all topics
    • Consultancy
      • Addressing online safety needs
      • Digital strategy review
      • Infrastructure review
      • + explore all consultancy

    GDPR

    Practical resources to help prepare you for the new General Data Protection Regulation legislation.

    Financial X-ray

    Compare and analyse the full cost of your IT services.

  • R&D
    • Projects
      • Data and analytics projects
      • Digital literacy projects
      • Infrastructure projects
      • Research data projects
      • + explore all topics
    • How we innovate
      • Co-design
      • 2016-17 consultation
      • - Challenge areas
      • Visions
    • R&D in numbers
    • Get involved
    • Future trends

    Take part in our student ideas competition

    Send us your ideas on how to improve life in education using technology. Closes 30 April 2018.

  • Digital resources
    • Library support
      • Jisc Collections
      • Archives Hub
      • Copac
      • Journal Usage Statistics Portal
      • The Keepers Registry
      • Knowledge Base+
      • OpenURL Router
      • SUNCAT
      • Zetoc
      • How we support e-resources management
    • Learning and research resources
      • Citizen Maths
      • Digimap Collections
      • Digimap for Colleges
      • e-books for FE
      • Hairdressing Training
      • Health and social care training Beta
      • Historical Texts
      • Journal Archives
      • Learning analytics Beta
      • Learning on Screen
      • MediaPlus
    • Open access
      • CORE
      • IRUS-UK
      • Monitor Local
      • Monitor UK
      • OpenDOAR
      • Publications Router
      • Repository technical support
      • SHERPA services
      • UK ORCID consortium membership
  • Network & technology
    • Connectivity
      • Janet Network
      • eduroam
      • Domain registry
      • Govroam
      • IP address assignment
      • Janet Network aurora2
      • Netpath
      • Netsight
      • Network time service (NTP)
      • Managed router service
      • Off-site resolver
      • Primary nameserver service
      • Routers and switches framework
      • Secondary nameserver service
      • Telecommunications framework
    • Cloud
      • Board and committee papers framework
      • Co-location service
      • Data archiving framework
      • GÉANT IaaS framework
      • G Suite for Education
      • Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
      • Microsoft Office 365
      • Shared data centre
    • Cyber security
      • DDoS mitigation
      • Email advice and testing
      • Penetration testing
      • Janet Network CSIRT
      • Mailer shield
      • Safe Share
      • Security blacklists and whitelists
      • Simulated phishing and associated training
      • Vulnerability assessment and information service
      • Web filtering and monitoring
    • Trust and identity
      • Assent
      • Certificate service
      • Liberate
      • UK Access Management Federation
    • Videoconferencing and communications
      • JiscMail
      • Janet txt
      • Online surveys
      • Telephony purchasing service
      • Vscene
  • Advice
    • Training
      • Digital leaders programme - higher and further education
      • Making your digital collections easier to discover
      • Workshop to Raise Awareness of Prevent (WRAP)
      • + explore all training
    • Guides
      • Data and analytics guides
      • Digital literacy guides
      • Open access guides
      • Research data guides
      • + explore all topics
    • Consultancy
      • Addressing online safety needs
      • Digital strategy review
      • Infrastructure review
      • + explore all consultancy
  • R&D
    • Projects
      • Data and analytics projects
      • Digital literacy projects
      • Infrastructure projects
      • Research data projects
      • + explore all topics
    • How we innovate
      • Co-design
      • 2016-17 consultation
      • - Challenge areas
      • Visions
    • R&D in numbers
    • Get involved
    • Future trends
Close search results

  • Give feedback
  • Membership
  • News
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Advice
  • Guides
  • Transforming assessment and feedback with technology
  • Marking and production of feedback
Guide

Marking and production of feedback

A stage of the assessment and feedback lifecycle 

Page 9 of 27 - Transforming assessment and feedback with technology

About this guide

  • Published: 9 October 2015
  • Updated: 29 February 2016

Print-ready

version

Contents

Transforming assessment and feedback with technology
  • Managing an assessment and feedback transformation project
    • Developing your project baseline
  • The assessment and feedback lifecycle
    • Specifying
    • Setting
    • Supporting
    • Submitting
    • Marking and production of feedback
    • Recording grades
    • Returning marks and feedback
    • Reflecting
  • Assessment and feedback themes
    • Assessment design
    • Assessing group work
    • Assessment literacy
    • Assessment patterning and scheduling
    • Developing academic practice
    • Employability and assessment
    • Feedback and feed forward
    • Inclusive assessment
    • Marking practice
    • Peer assessment
    • Peer review
    • Quality assurance and standards
    • Student self reflection
    • Work-based assessment

What does marking and production of feedback involve?

Creative Commons attribution information
The assessment and feedback life cycle (adapted from an original by Manchester Metropolitan University)
CC BY-NC-SA

This is a key stage in the lifecycle when student work is formally evaluated against a set of predefined assessment criteria with marks and feedback provided.

Feedback and marking are separate entities and serve quite distinct purposes. In some cases assessments may be purely formative and feedback given with no mark associated. In this section we have addressed the more complex scenario where an assignment will have both marks and feedback. The importance of purely formative feedback for student's long term development must however be noted.

There may be multiple evaluators involved in assessing the work of a single student - the reasons for this are discussed further below. Here we look at a situation where teaching staff provide feedback and marks and consider peer review and assessment as separate themes (also under the lifecycle section on reflecting).

There are many distinct tasks under this element of the life ycle including distributing work to markers, marking itself, production of feedback and collation and verification of marks.

It's possible to carry out all of these tasks electronically but in practice many institutions still use a combination of online, off-line and paper-based processes.

What are we trying to achieve?

The main purposes of this life cycle stage are:

  • To give a piece of work a final grade in relation to the assessment criteria
  • To provide feedback to aid student longitudinal development.

The processes used to carry out these tasks are designed with two further objectives in mind:

  • To ensure that the work of each student is marked fairly
  • To ensure consistency of approach across different cohorts of students.

Particularly in HE, internal quality assurance processes will generally demand that marking and feedback is carried out in a certain way for a particular assignment. The main features of such processes are:

  • Moderation to ensure a consistent approach across different markers
  • Double or second marking to give additional scrutiny to the work of individual students particularly for high stakes assignments.

There are four main models of marking and feedback in the UK. We have defined these models based on research undertaken at the University of Manchester and validated with a wide range of HE providers as part of our EMA project. The models are:

Early moderation

Assignments are marked and marks and feedback recorded. A sample of assignments is then submitted to a moderator (or occasionally multiple moderators) who verifies that marking is consistent across all of the different markers involved. Any anomalies are reconciled prior to feedback and marks being released to students.

The sample used is usually a percentage that should include any fails, firsts or borderline marks.

Late moderation

The process is as described above except that feedback (and possibly provisional marks as well) can be released to students prior to the moderation process taking place

Double-blind marking

The work of each student is evaluated by two assessors who are each working blind to the marks and feedback given by the other. The two markers can work in parallel provided the technical settings of the marking tool used allows for this. In this case the student will usually receive two marks and two sets of feedback on the same piece of work.

Open second marking

As above, the work of each student is evaluated by two assessors but in this case the marking takes place sequentially with the role of the second marker being to validate the work of the first. The student receives a single mark and set of feedback. In some cases the two markers will collaborate to agree the mark.

The choice of approach to marking generally depends on the overall value of the assignment and its weighting in relation to overall marks for a particular programme of study. Some form of second marking and moderation can however be a staff development opportunity for new members of staff.

How might we use technology at the marking and production of feedback stage of the lifecycle and what are the benefits?

Technology can support all aspects of marking and feedback (often termed e-marking and e-feedback). Marking can take place online and increasingly off-line and feedback can be provided in digital formats including text, audio and video. The benefits of e-marking and e-feedback are most evident for academic staff and include:

  • Convenience of not collecting and carrying large quantities of paper
  • Convenience of electronic filing
  • Security of having work backed up on an online system
  • Ability to moderate marks without having to physically exchange paper
  • Increased speed and efficiency of being able to reuse common comments
  • Improved morale through not having to write out repeated comments
  • Convenience of undertaking originality checking in the same environment as marking
  • Improved clarity of marking and feedback and the ability to include lengthy comments at the appropriate point in the text
  • Improved consistency of marking
  • Ability to add audio comments and annotations as well as typed comments
  • Ability to give qualitatively different feedback in different media eg, audio feedback for language programmes for intonation and pronunciation.

The benefits are also significant for students and there is indeed considerable student demand for e-feedback. These include:

  • Improved clarity, particularly not having to decipher handwriting
  • Improved privacy as compared to having paper assignments distributed in pigeonholes
  • Easy storage increasing the likelihood that feedback will be reviewed at a later date
  • Improved quality of feedback as tutors spend less time repeating common comments and concentrate more on the individual aspects of the assignment

What are the common problems?

Our research found this to be the most problematic component of the lifecycle as it is the area where the fit between institutional processes and the functionality of commercially available systems is least well matched.

Marks and feedback are different entities and need to be handled differently but technology platforms tend to conflate the two. Additionally most commercial systems don't provide functionality to meet the needs of each of the different roles in common marking and moderation processes. In practice this causes the following difficulties:

  • Inability to release feedback to students separately from their marks
  • Inability to support blind marking ie to hide the first marker's comments from a second marker
  • Risk of second markers and external examiners overwriting or deleting comments made by an earlier marker
  • Difficulties in recording decisions taken during the moderation process eg mark before and after moderation and reason it was changed
     

Tip: Ensure your marking and feedback processes are not over-complicated. Use our workflow models to compare your own practice to sector norms and cut out any unnecessary steps.



Use the model and system specification to discuss your requirements with your system supplier to inform their future development plans.

Despite the benefits of e-marking and e-feedback, institutions often defer to the preferences of individual academics when it comes to how they carry out the task. This means institutions supporting academics using a variety of different tools for marking and feedback as well as those who still work on paper.

There are some general issues around the ability of systems to deal with mathematical and scientific or musical notation but otherwise the issue is really down to personal preference as to whether or not tutors like to mark on screen.

For those who are prepared to undertake e-marking there is also a distinction between online or off-line marking with the former being currently better supported by systems than the latter. Some staff prefer familiar tools such as Microsoft Word but find the lack of integration with other EMA systems a drawback eg, the need to return work to each student separately involving an email per student and compromising anonymity.

Getting used to online marking tools may take a while but there is good evidence that integrated tools save time on the overall marking process. Deciding which tools to use is not necessarily a straightforward matter if the institution supports multiple tools, as the attractiveness of each may vary according to the type of assignment and marking process.

Tip: Emphasising the benefits of online marking and getting internal champions to share their experiences can be an effective way of bringing more staff on board without needing to be strongly directive.

Whilst a lot of effort is expended on comparing and moderating marks, it is less common for programme teams to discuss feedback given to students. Consequently approaches can vary greatly with some feedback being much more comprehensive and useful than other examples.

Feedback can take many forms. Praise and feedback on content is less effective in the long term than feedback on skills and self-regulatory abilities. The latter are more likely to develop autonomy in learning and an ability to make evaluative judgements without the support of a teacher. Clarifying what purpose feedback is expected to serve and analysing tutor feedback therefore needs to become normal practice for academic staff.

Tip: Our feedback and feedforward guide provides more ideas on giving effective feedback and tools for monitoring and comparing feedback.

Giving feedback can be very time consuming for academic staff and some staff may question whether the time spent is worthwhile if they are not confident that students are using and acting upon the feedback. See our section on reflecting for more help on this topic.

Tip: Make use of time saving tools such as comment banks to avoid repeating frequently used comments. Try giving audio feedback if you type slowly - this can save time and be more meaningful and personal.

What resources can help?

  • A report from the University of Huddersfield looks at staff and student attitudes to EMA and describes the strategies used to effect large scale change
  • Read our case study on embedding electronic assessment management at Queen’s University Belfast
  • Find out how Edinburgh College saved staff time and improved learning outcomes by implementing Turnitin
  • Electronic Feedback is a marking assistant developed by Philip Denton of Liverpool John Moores University. The application uses MS Excel and Word to generate student reports in print and email messages. To obtain a copy of this free tool contact p.denton@ljmu.ac.uk
  • Read Manchester Metropolitan University's suggestions for trying something new with feedback
  • The Sounds Good project explored using digital audio to give student feedback
  • Read the University of Oxford's guide on how to create audio feedback
  • The universities of Reading and Plymouth have a useful website based on their experiences with video feedback

Related themes

Feedback and feed forward
Marking practice
Peer assessment
Peer review
Quality assurance and standards

Book Navigation

  • ‹ Submitting
  • up
  • Recording grades ›
Is there anything wrong with this page?

Useful links

  • Staff directory
  • Find your account manager
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Website information
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • @Jisc
  • Analysis from @timeshighered’s data team suggests big differences among disciplines in the amount of scholarship th… https://t.co/0nNB2VmBvT
Digital resources
  • Library support
  • Learning and research resources
  • Open access
Network & technology
  • Connectivity
  • Cloud
  • Cyber security
  • Trust and identity
  • Videoconferencing and communications
Advice
  • Training
  • Guides
  • Consultancy
R&D
  • Projects
  • How we innovate
  • R&D in numbers
  • Get involved
  • Future trends
© Jisc - all rights reserved