We use cookies to give you the best experience and to help improve our website.

Find out more about how we use cookies Thanks for letting me know
Skip to main content
Jisc logo 0300 300 2212
  • Digital resources
    • Library support
      • Jisc Collections
      • Archives Hub
      • Copac
      • Journal Usage Statistics Portal
      • The Keepers Registry
      • Knowledge Base+
      • OpenURL Router
      • SUNCAT
      • Zetoc
      • How we support e-resources management
    • Learning and research resources
      • Citizen Maths
      • Digimap Collections
      • Digimap for Colleges
      • e-books for FE
      • Hairdressing Training
      • Health and social care training Beta
      • Historical Texts
      • Journal Archives
      • Learning analytics Beta
      • Learning on Screen
      • MediaPlus
    • Open access
      • CORE
      • IRUS-UK
      • Monitor Local
      • Monitor UK
      • OpenDOAR
      • Publications Router
      • Repository technical support
      • SHERPA services
      • UK ORCID consortium membership

    Jisc Collections

    We negotiate with publishers, on behalf of the UK higher education sector, to procure and license affordable digital content

  • Network & technology
    • Connectivity
      • Janet Network
      • eduroam
      • Domain registry
      • Govroam
      • IP address assignment
      • Janet Network aurora2
      • Netpath
      • Netsight
      • Network time service (NTP)
      • Managed router service
      • Off-site resolver
      • Primary nameserver service
      • Routers and switches framework
      • Secondary nameserver service
      • Telecommunications framework
    • Cloud
      • Board and committee papers framework
      • Co-location service
      • Data archiving framework
      • GÉANT IaaS framework
      • G Suite for Education
      • Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
      • Microsoft Office 365
      • Shared data centre
    • Cyber security
      • DDoS mitigation
      • Email advice and testing
      • Penetration testing
      • Janet Network CSIRT
      • Mailer shield
      • Safe Share
      • Security blacklists and whitelists
      • Simulated phishing and associated training
      • Vulnerability assessment and information service
      • Web filtering and monitoring
    • Trust and identity
      • Assent
      • Certificate service
      • Liberate
      • UK Access Management Federation
    • Videoconferencing and communications
      • JiscMail
      • Janet txt
      • Online surveys
      • Telephony purchasing service
      • Vscene
  • Advice
    • Training
      • Digital leaders programme - higher and further education
      • Making your digital collections easier to discover
      • Workshop to Raise Awareness of Prevent (WRAP)
      • + explore all training
    • Guides
      • Data and analytics guides
      • Digital literacy guides
      • Open access guides
      • Research data guides
      • + explore all topics
    • Consultancy
      • Addressing online safety needs
      • Digital strategy review
      • Infrastructure review
      • + explore all consultancy

    GDPR

    Practical resources to help prepare you for the new General Data Protection Regulation legislation.

    Financial X-ray

    Compare and analyse the full cost of your IT services.

  • R&D
    • Projects
      • Data and analytics projects
      • Digital literacy projects
      • Infrastructure projects
      • Research data projects
      • + explore all topics
    • How we innovate
      • Co-design
      • 2016-17 consultation
      • - Challenge areas
      • Visions
    • R&D in numbers
    • Get involved
    • Future trends

    Take part in our student ideas competition

    Send us your ideas on how to improve life in education using technology. Closes 30 April 2018.

  • Digital resources
    • Library support
      • Jisc Collections
      • Archives Hub
      • Copac
      • Journal Usage Statistics Portal
      • The Keepers Registry
      • Knowledge Base+
      • OpenURL Router
      • SUNCAT
      • Zetoc
      • How we support e-resources management
    • Learning and research resources
      • Citizen Maths
      • Digimap Collections
      • Digimap for Colleges
      • e-books for FE
      • Hairdressing Training
      • Health and social care training Beta
      • Historical Texts
      • Journal Archives
      • Learning analytics Beta
      • Learning on Screen
      • MediaPlus
    • Open access
      • CORE
      • IRUS-UK
      • Monitor Local
      • Monitor UK
      • OpenDOAR
      • Publications Router
      • Repository technical support
      • SHERPA services
      • UK ORCID consortium membership
  • Network & technology
    • Connectivity
      • Janet Network
      • eduroam
      • Domain registry
      • Govroam
      • IP address assignment
      • Janet Network aurora2
      • Netpath
      • Netsight
      • Network time service (NTP)
      • Managed router service
      • Off-site resolver
      • Primary nameserver service
      • Routers and switches framework
      • Secondary nameserver service
      • Telecommunications framework
    • Cloud
      • Board and committee papers framework
      • Co-location service
      • Data archiving framework
      • GÉANT IaaS framework
      • G Suite for Education
      • Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
      • Microsoft Office 365
      • Shared data centre
    • Cyber security
      • DDoS mitigation
      • Email advice and testing
      • Penetration testing
      • Janet Network CSIRT
      • Mailer shield
      • Safe Share
      • Security blacklists and whitelists
      • Simulated phishing and associated training
      • Vulnerability assessment and information service
      • Web filtering and monitoring
    • Trust and identity
      • Assent
      • Certificate service
      • Liberate
      • UK Access Management Federation
    • Videoconferencing and communications
      • JiscMail
      • Janet txt
      • Online surveys
      • Telephony purchasing service
      • Vscene
  • Advice
    • Training
      • Digital leaders programme - higher and further education
      • Making your digital collections easier to discover
      • Workshop to Raise Awareness of Prevent (WRAP)
      • + explore all training
    • Guides
      • Data and analytics guides
      • Digital literacy guides
      • Open access guides
      • Research data guides
      • + explore all topics
    • Consultancy
      • Addressing online safety needs
      • Digital strategy review
      • Infrastructure review
      • + explore all consultancy
  • R&D
    • Projects
      • Data and analytics projects
      • Digital literacy projects
      • Infrastructure projects
      • Research data projects
      • + explore all topics
    • How we innovate
      • Co-design
      • 2016-17 consultation
      • - Challenge areas
      • Visions
    • R&D in numbers
    • Get involved
    • Future trends
Close search results

  • Give feedback
  • Membership
  • News
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Advice
  • Guides
  • Transforming assessment and feedback with technology
  • Developing academic practice
Guide

Developing academic practice

Page 18 of 27 - Transforming assessment and feedback with technology

About this guide

  • Published: 9 October 2015
  • Updated: 9 October 2015

Print-ready

version

Contents

Transforming assessment and feedback with technology
  • Managing an assessment and feedback transformation project
    • Developing your project baseline
  • The assessment and feedback lifecycle
    • Specifying
    • Setting
    • Supporting
    • Submitting
    • Marking and production of feedback
    • Recording grades
    • Returning marks and feedback
    • Reflecting
  • Assessment and feedback themes
    • Assessment design
    • Assessing group work
    • Assessment literacy
    • Assessment patterning and scheduling
    • Developing academic practice
    • Employability and assessment
    • Feedback and feed forward
    • Inclusive assessment
    • Marking practice
    • Peer assessment
    • Peer review
    • Quality assurance and standards
    • Student self reflection
    • Work-based assessment

Why is developing academic practice important?

It's just as important for staff to reflect on their assessment and feedback practice as for students to consider the outcomes of particular assessments.

Learning and teaching practice does not stand still. Whilst underlying good practice principles may have a relatively long validity, the changing technical landscape regularly offers new ways of implementing good practice.

Even the underpinning principles themselves require review at certain intervals. For example, recent research into approaches such as peer review reveals benefits that you should take into account when updating assessment strategies.

What are the common problems?

Time is an important factor. Staff overloaded by traditional assessment and feedback practices don't have time to step back and reflect on how to do things differently and better. This is a particular issue where the underlying processes are poor; academic staff often describe themselves as being on a treadmill where they identify underlying, badly designed business processes but don't have the time or analysis skills to redesign them.

Risk aversion is also a significant issue. Staff don't want to take risks with something as important as assessment practice. They may fear the opinion of external quality assessors or worry that innovative or unfamiliar types of assignment may prove problematic for students and bring down the grade point average.

"New tutors often have a limited feel for what good feedback looks like or what standard of feedback, in terms of length and specificity, is expected. They may concentrate on proving their superior knowledge to the student rather than focussing on improving the students’ work in future."
Transforming the Experience of Students through Assessment (TESTA)

Culture is also an issue. Approaches to assessment and feedback are often highly personal. Academic staff often don't view themselves as having regular working hours. The fact that they often complete marking and feedback off campus suggests that it's done in their own time and they should therefore have freedom of choice in how they do it.

Feedback in particular has been described as taking place in a black box with little or no discussion amongst programme teams about approaches and the types of feedback given by individual academics. In these circumstances it is not surprising to find inconsistent approaches and variable quality.

Despite rigorous processes to ensure quality and standards, marking and grading is still a subjective matter. New lecturers tend to rely more heavily on written criteria but also to mark more harshly. More experienced lecturers may develop tacit and personalised standards of marking which are not necessarily shared across the whole programme or department.

Profiling feedback

Evidence from feedback audits undertaken by Jisc projects shows that typical feedback profiles may differ considerably between institutions. In our audits the 'typical' profile in each sample skewed towards a particular type of feedback:

  • In sample A (postgraduate online distance learning programme in medical education) 95% of feedback related to content and 72% related to the immediate task
  • In sample B (a range of masters level courses in education) praise statements were the most common element of summative feedback; there was little advice given and that advice was short rather than longer term
  • In sample C (modern languages) a higher percentage of comments concentrated on weaknesses rather than strengths.

Good feedback looks at strengths and weaknesses and helps students define specific actions for improvement which feeds into future assignments. In the resources below you will find some tools to help you undertake your own feedback audit.

How might we use technology and what are the benefits?

It can streamline business processes and simplify workflows by automating many manual tasks. Having assignments in digital format offers many advantages over the issues associated with copying, distributing and storing material on paper.

E-marking and e-feedback can be quicker and more user-friendly, both for staff and students, than traditional methods (see our section on marking practice).

There are a range of online tools available to support staff development by helping with feedback auditing and supporting tutor self-development and we point to some of these in our resources section.

How does designing assessment practice relate to the lifecycle?

The reflecting stage covers not only student reflection but also staff reflection both on their own practice and student performance to inform future iterations of similar courses.

What resources can help?

Our video case study outlines how Queen's University, Belfast changed assessment and feedback practices using appreciative inquiry approaches:

  • University College London's feedback profiling tool and supporting guidance enables individuals or teams to analyse feedback and enourages reflection
  • The Open Mentor tool supports tutor reflection on feedback
  • The Feedback Analysis Chart for Tutors (FACT) is an evaluation tool based on feedback 'depth'
  • The University of Dundee's action plan template assists with developing assessment and feedback practice.

Consensus marking exercise (adapted from the work of TESTA)

The TESTA project highlighted student awareness of variations between markers. They identify ‘hawks’ and ‘sparrows’ on programme teams and often choose modules accordingly.

This exercise strengthened shared standards and consistency between markers:

  • Use two previously assessed scripts at the same level but with different marks
  • Invite the programme team to an hour long meeting
  • Ask colleagues to brainstorm what they are looking for in this assignment – this should be fresh and intuitive rather than orthodox
  • Ask colleagues to read and mark the pieces
  • Collect initial marks in a hat – written but anonymous
  • Discuss the pieces to gain impressions
  • Agree a consensus mark, and compare with initial marks
  • Revise criteria or agree to meet again to discuss other assessed work.

The team tried the exercise without the anonymous marks. A respected academic spoke first and dismissed one piece that had previously been double marked and given two first class marks. Most of the team adjusted to this and gave the work 50s and low 60s with no-one daring to give it a first. This demonstrates the value of the anonymous initial marking.

Good practice in feedback monitoring

The Open University (OU) has the highest ratings of any university for feedback in the National Student Survey even though all of its teaching takes place at a distance. The OU gives all of its tutors training on how to give feedback. They provide exemplars of good feedback and advice on using the 'OU sandwich’ of positive comments, advice on how to improve, followed by an encouraging summary.

The OU also monitors the standard of feedback that tutors provide to students. An experienced staff tutor samples new tutors’ marking. If they see feedback that falls below accepted standards (for example too brief to be understandable) or is inappropriate (ie, overly critical with little advice on how to improve), they will contact the tutor for a discussion. That tutor’s feedback will go on a higher level of monitoring until it's seen to improve.

Walsall College, which has an outstanding Ofsted rating, takes a similar approach. It has a number of ‘coaches’ who sample feedback for each subject area and provide staff development for any tutors whose feedback is felt to be inappropriate for the level of study - particularly that which focuses only on the assessment criteria and not on longitudinal development. Careful monitoring of feedback provided by new tutors takes place in the early days.

Both the OU and Walsall College operate strict rules for the timely return of feedback and monitor tutor adherence to this.

 

Book Navigation

  • ‹ Assessment patterning and scheduling
  • up
  • Employability and assessment ›
Is there anything wrong with this page?

Useful links

  • Staff directory
  • Find your account manager
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Website information
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • @Jisc
  • Analysis from @timeshighered’s data team suggests big differences among disciplines in the amount of scholarship th… https://t.co/0nNB2VmBvT
Digital resources
  • Library support
  • Learning and research resources
  • Open access
Network & technology
  • Connectivity
  • Cloud
  • Cyber security
  • Trust and identity
  • Videoconferencing and communications
Advice
  • Training
  • Guides
  • Consultancy
R&D
  • Projects
  • How we innovate
  • R&D in numbers
  • Get involved
  • Future trends
© Jisc - all rights reserved