The SOAP Opera 2 project will build on the work that the existing SOAP Opera project team has carried out from July 2009 to date, which has led to an understanding of how, following a comprehensive appraisal, the current academic-facing systems might be remodeled. This remodeling will employ a service oriented approach, to decrease duplication of functionality and improve the end-user experience. In addition, a financial and environmental impact assessment of the remodeling will be undertaken. The catalyst for this re-modeling will be the introduction of new Portal and VLE platforms over the coming 18 months.

SOAPOpera 2

Overview

The SOAP Opera 2 project will build on the work that the existing SOAP Opera project team has carried out from July 2009 to date, which has led to an understanding of how, following a comprehensive appraisal, the current academic-facing systems might be remodeled. This remodeling will employ a service oriented approach, to decrease duplication of functionality and improve the end-user experience. In addition, a financial and environmental impact assessment of the remodeling will be undertaken. The catalyst for this re-modeling will be the introduction of new Portal and VLE platforms over the coming 18 months.

Aims and objectives 

The overall aim of our project is to review the relevant elements of our enterprise architecture with the aim of providing a model and supporting resources that will enable the future service oriented development of our systems and processes.

This remodelling will employ a service oriented approach, to decrease duplication of functionality and improve the end-user experience.  In addition, a financial and environmental impact assessment of the remodelling will be undertaken. The catalyst for this re-modelling will be the introduction of new Portal and VLE platforms over the coming 18 months.

Our objectives for the project are to help us improve the following aspects of our student facing ALT services by identifying and, where appropriate quantifying, potential:

  • Efficiencies: Cost, time and environmental savings
  • Effectiveness: Business process and service quality improvement for all stakeholders
  • Enablement: Improved agility, flexibility and ability to respond to new opportunities

Project methodology

  • Undertake a thorough ‘stock check’ of the functionality available to users across the major portfolio of learning-support systems. (LLI)
  • Undertake an investigation with a range of staff, student and support stakeholders to build a comprehensive picture of the business processes and functions they need to undertake and access. (Business Analysts)
  • Undertake a financial and environmental impact analysis of current functionality including areas of duplication, and the potential for a reduction in training and support. (Project Team)
  • Engage in dialogue with vendors regarding their product road-map, and explore areas for potential product development. (Service Owners)

Anticipated outputs and outcomes

The project deliverables, combined from SOAP Opera 1 and 2 will be

Interim Deliverables
  • A robust project plan (this document)
  • Ongoing project documentation such as two progress reports, two budget reports, meeting agendas and minutes (as per Section 4 of JISC Project Management Guidelines)
  • Communications and dissemination activities, including the FSD website project page, project website and blog
    Evaluation interim reports
    Inputs to the EA modelling activities, including:

From workpackage 1: Populated function / application catalogue describing the currently implemented information systems; with licence and other costs
From workpackage 2: Cross-mapping of current journeys and logical functions to systems functions

Final Deliverables

Enterprise architecture models

(based on TOGAF and modelled in Archimate) that describe the “as is” and “to be” student facing ALT services platform commonly present in an HEI and that, if implemented, would deliver the benefits identified in Section 2 Aims and Objectives

Catalogue

of services, functions, processes and systems (using the open source SOA Governance registry application from WSO2  - htttp://wso2.com/products/governance-registry

Improvement  report

detailing potential a) business process and service quality improvements for vendors, academic staff, students and support staff, and b) improved agility, flexibility and ability to respond to new opportunities

Roadmap

showing how our University could move from the “as is” to the “to be” models (including any constraints, dependencies etc)

Financial and environmental impact reports

identifying potential efficiencies of implementing the envisioned enterprise architecture model (using the BiiLs and Suste-IT Carbon Footprint tools respectively)

Vendor engagement report

outlining the engagements, and their views on the potential for disaggregating their products based on a service-oriented architecture

FSD Community report

cross-referencing our results with other Universities experiences to determine the extent to which the information gathered is of relevance to the broader JISC community

Case study

developed iteratively and used as the basis to report to JISC throughout the project life cycle

Project plan and reports

Evaluation report, completion report, final report, final budget report

Other Outputs
  • Productive working relationships formed with other members of the STG, HEIs and commercial providers around shared services and technical developments.
  • Staff with skills and experience in evaluation of effective service delivery using cost-benefit analysis (BiiLs)
  • Staff with skills and experience in environmental impact analysis using (Suste-IT Carbon Footprint)
  • Staff with skills and experience in use of TOGAF and Archimate (and the related Archi modelling tool)
Outcomes 
  • The project outcomes build on those identified in the original project, which include:
  • Efficiency (cost, time and environmental) savings potential identified
    Identified improvements to the student experience as a result of the systems and business processes involved being optimised
  • Feedback into the FSD and wider FE/HE community, resulting in knowledge being shared across the sector and enabling the benefits to be realisable sector-wide.
  • Integration into the financial modelling of all future student facing ALT service planning.
  • Enhanced understanding of data integration issues and opportunities, leading to more agile and robust integration and use of new products, and thereby allowing the University to develop a more personalised learning experience for students

Outcomes specific to this project are:

  • Opportunities for effectiveness improvements - to business processes and ways of working that will provide a higher quality of service to students and staff
  • Awareness of how our models compare with those of other Universities

Technology / Standards used 

PRINCE2, SOA, ITIL, BIILS, UML, M_o_R, TOGAF, Archimate, Suste-IT



 

Project Staff

Project Manager

Rob Moores

Leeds Metropolitan University

Information Management and Technology Services

R.Moores@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 3102

Project Team

Wendy Luker (Project Director)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Library and Learning Innovation

W.luker.leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 3613

Zafer Ali (Project Officer)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Library and Learning Innovation

Z.ali.leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 8521

Peter Sellek (Senior Business Analyst)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Information Management and Technology Services

P.Sellek@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 5809

 

Russell Lockwood (Senior Business Analyst)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Information Management and Technology Services

R.Lockwood@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 5967

 

Colin Pattinson (Senior Project Consultant)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Faculty of Arts, Environment and Technology

C.Pattinson@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 3741

 

Dr Jill Taylor (Senior Project Consultant)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Technology Enhanced Learning Team

J.D.Taylor@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 6302

 

Ian Maitland (Project Consultant)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Information Management and Technology Services

I.Maitland@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 3900

 

Rob Moore (Project Consultant)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Information Management and Technology Services

R.M.Moore@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 5475

 

Mitesh Patel (Project Consultant)

Leeds Metropolitan University

Library and Learning Innovation

M.Patel@leedsmet.ac.uk

0113 812 5922

Bookmark and Share
Summary
Start date
1 July 2010
End date
31 May 2011
Funding programme
Flexible service delivery programme
Project website
Lead institutions

Leeds Metropolitan University

Partner institutions

Software vendors within scope and informally other institutions in FSD programme.